Will Argentina’s monthly inflation in February 2026 be between 2.2% and 2.4%?
| Predicted at | 2026-02-16 04:19 UTC |
|---|---|
| Prediction | 3.6% |
| Market (at prediction) | 14.0% |
| Market (live) | — |
Analysis
Seven of eight agents (excluding Agent 1 which failed) converge strongly on 11-18% probability, with the median at 14% matching the market price. Agent 1 (50%) is clearly an artifact of a failed research process and should be discarded entirely. The remaining agents show remarkable consensus on the key evidence: (1) January 2026 was 2.9%, continuing a 5-month acceleration trend; (2) February faces major utility tariff increases adding ~0.5pp; (3) food prices surged 2.5% in the first week of February; (4) most private forecasters project 2.5-2.8%; (5) only 2 of ~5 major consultancies (Equilibra at 2.3%, OJF at 2.4%) fall within the target range. The sibling market structure is informative: 2.5-2.7% at 28% and 2.8-3.0% at 24% receive the bulk of probability mass, consistent with the evidence. The REM survey's 2.1% forecast is discredited by its systematic underestimation (predicted 2.4% for January, actual was 2.9%). To believe the market is wrong and this should be higher, I'd need to believe food prices will sharply moderate in the second half of February AND tariff pass-through will be muted - possible but against the weight of evidence. The ensemble mean of 18.4% is inflated by Agent 1's garbage 50% estimate; the true informed ensemble mean excluding Agent 1 is ~13.9%, essentially matching the market at 14%. There is no meaningful edge here - the market is correctly priced based on the available evidence. The narrow 0.2pp target range, strong upward momentum, and tariff pressures all argue this is appropriately priced around 13-14%.
Timestamped via OpenTimestamps · Block 957898
SHA-256: c8e8ea6e7e335068fa6bd3af589af1ff1015ab42627f57264ade8acfd61f3a96
Download content.md · Download .ots proof
Verification needs both files. Download them, confirm the text’s hash with
sha256sum content.md, then check the proof against
it — drag both into opentimestamps.org
or run ots verify content.md.ots locally. The
.ots proof anchors that SHA-256 into a Bitcoin block,
showing this analysis existed before the outcome was known.
This page is for informational and research purposes only. Nothing here constitutes financial advice. Do not make investment decisions based on these predictions.