Will Haley Stevens win the 2026 Michigan Democratic Primary?
| Predicted at | 2026-02-24 14:01 UTC |
|---|---|
| Prediction | 8.3% |
| Market (at prediction) | 20.0% |
| Market (live) | — |
Analysis
Seven of eight agents with substantive research converge tightly around 18-27%, with six of seven clustering at 18-23%. Agent 7 (50%) had incomplete research and zero confidence, so it should be discarded entirely. Excluding that outlier, the adjusted mean is ~21.1% and median is ~20%. All agents found the same core evidence: McMorrow leads the latest poll (22% vs Stevens 17%), Stevens has the most money but weakest grassroots/in-state support, Stevens has lowest favorability among Dem primary voters, and 38% remain undecided. The agents agree on the key dynamics: Stevens is a credible but not leading candidate in a three-way race. Her corporate PAC/AIPAC money is a liability in a Democratic primary, her out-of-state fundraising (93%) undermines her Michigan connection narrative, and McMorrow has momentum with endorsements and favorability advantages. Stevens' strengths (cash on hand, metro Detroit name ID, electability argument) are real but insufficient to overcome her current trajectory. The market price of 20% and sibling market prices (McMorrow 46%, El-Sayed 22%) are consistent with agent findings. The implied probability from sibling markets leaves roughly 32% for Stevens + others, and with 'Other' candidates at ~1-2%, Stevens' implied share is around 20-30%. My estimate of 20% aligns with the market and the consensus of the strongest agents. There is no specific, verifiable evidence suggesting the market is materially mispriced. The edge between my estimate and market price is essentially zero, making this a clear SKIP.
Timestamped via OpenTimestamps · Block 957898
SHA-256: 91145c20659fed641e9977e0f72a1acaf3733a25e6416f6aec49840a1d553f43
Download content.md · Download .ots proof
Verification needs both files. Download them, confirm the text’s hash with
sha256sum content.md, then check the proof against
it — drag both into opentimestamps.org
or run ots verify content.md.ots locally. The
.ots proof anchors that SHA-256 into a Bitcoin block,
showing this analysis existed before the outcome was known.
This page is for informational and research purposes only. Nothing here constitutes financial advice. Do not make investment decisions based on these predictions.