Will Trump say “Low IQ” by February 28?
| Predicted at | 2026-02-16 06:04 UTC |
|---|---|
| Prediction | 81.3% |
| Market (at prediction) | 60.0% |
| Market (live) | — |
Analysis
Agents split into three camps: high-confidence YES (Agents 1,4,7 at 85-99%) based on specific evidence claims that may predate market creation; moderate YES (Agents 2,5,8 at 72-75%) based on base rates; and near-coin-flip (Agents 3,6 at 48-55%) based on transcript checking finding nothing in February. The base rate argument is compelling - ~1 use/week over 12 days gives roughly 82% probability assuming independence, but adjusting down for: (1) market hasn't resolved suggesting no confirmed instance in first 4-5 days, (2) presidential context may reduce frequency, (3) market traders at 60% have real-time monitoring advantage. Agent 7's evidence of a Feb 15 Facebook video is potentially decisive but unverified. Settling at 70% reflects the strong base rate tempered by market signal and lack of confirmed resolution.
Timestamped via OpenTimestamps · Block 957898
SHA-256: b034be118fc1bf489d46c613af0edb3d23eb6680116f7fbaaa8e5555a83eb5b2
Download content.md · Download .ots proof
Verification needs both files. Download them, confirm the text’s hash with
sha256sum content.md, then check the proof against
it — drag both into opentimestamps.org
or run ots verify content.md.ots locally. The
.ots proof anchors that SHA-256 into a Bitcoin block,
showing this analysis existed before the outcome was known.
This page is for informational and research purposes only. Nothing here constitutes financial advice. Do not make investment decisions based on these predictions.